1.7 KiB
Prompt
The human rejected keeping the April Tractor pin as a landing baseline. They requested the reviewed wkt/addr_unpacking branch, removal of the new rollback adaptations, reuse of original Piker histories where possible, and a candidate prepared within their gateway relocation window. They asked specifically whether the runtime validation review hunk duplicated older endpoint history.
Response summary
Select the reviewed address branch at an immutable locked revision and preserve all committed application/test compatibility code. Verify the minimal dependency boundary offline and preview existing consumer fixes without importing unrelated datad/backfill changes. Distinguish original-source test results from live teardown acceptance, which is not available in this preparation window.
Files changed
pyproject.toml: select Tractorwkt/addr_unpacking.uv.lock: resolve revieweda966928dand setproctitle 1.3.8 while preserving Polars 1.36.0 and the rest of the locked graph.
Human edits
The human redirected the task from an older known-good runtime to a modern landing stack and insisted on reusing original history rather than building new compatibility adapters. They proposed stricter exception-group behavior as a hypothesis and set the live-test/time constraints. Those directions materially changed the dependency boundary. No direct manual edits to this final boundary were observed; runtime acceptance and landing remain human-owned.