Add a default "contents label" (eg. OHLC values for bar charts) to each
chart and update on crosshair interaction.
Few technical changes to make this happen:
- adjust bar graphics to have the HL line be in the "middle" of the
underlying arrays' "index range" in the containing view.
- add a label dict each chart's graphics name to a label + update routine
- use symbol names instead of this "main" identifier crap for referring to
particular price curves/graphics
This is a first attempt at a financial signal processing subsystem which
utilizes async generators for streaming frames of numpy array data
between actors. In this initial attempt the focus is on processing price
data and relaying it to the chart app for real-time display. So far this
seems to work (with decent latency) but much more work is likely needed
around improving the data model for even better latency and less data
duplication.
Surprisingly (or not?) a lot of simplifications to the charting code
came out of this in terms of conducting graphics updates in streaming
tasks instead of hiding them inside the obfuscated mess that is the
Qt-style-inheritance-OO-90s-trash. The goal from here on wards will be
to enforce strict semantics around reading and writing of data such that
state is kept outside "object trees" as much as possible and streaming
function semantics guide our flow model. Unsurprisingly, this reduction
in "instance state" is happening wherever we use `trio` ;)
A little summary on the technical changes:
- not going to explain the fsp system yet; it's too nascent and
probably going to get some heavy editing.
- drop any "update" methods from the `LinkedCharts` type since each
sub-chart will have it's own update task and thus a separate update
loop; further individual graphics (per chart) may eventually require
this same design.
- delete `ChartView`; moved into separate mod.
- add "stream from fsp" task to start our foray into real-time actor
processed numpy streaming.
Since the new FSP system will require time aligned data amongst actors,
it makes sense to share broker data feeds as much as possible on a local
system. There doesn't seem to be downside to this approach either since
if not fanning-out in our code, the broker (server) has to do it anyway
(and who knows how junk their implementation is) though with more
clients, sockets etc. in memory on our end. It also preps the code for
introducing a more "serious" pub-sub systems like zeromq/nanomessage.
Wait for a first actual real-time quote before starting graphics update
tasks. Use the new normalized tick format brokers are expected to emit
as a `quotes['ticks']` list. Auto detect time frame from historical
bars.
Wrap the sync client in an async interface in anticipation of an actual
async client. This starts support for the `open_fee()`/`stream_quotes()`
api though the tick normalization isn't correct yet.
Start a draft normalization format for (sampled) tick data.
Ideally we move toward the dense tick format (DFT) enforced by
techtonicDB, but for now let's just get a dict of something simple
going: `{'type': 'trade', 'price': <price}` kind of thing. This
gets us started being able to real-time chart from all data feed
back-ends. Oh, and hack in support for XAUUSD..and get subactor
logging workin.
Tyler Goodlet