After much effort (and exhaustion) but failure to get a view into
our `numpy` OHLC struct-array, this instead allocates an in-thread-memory
array which is updated with flattened data every flow update cycle.
I need to report what I think is a bug to `numpy` core about the whole
view thing not working but, more or less this gets the same behaviour
and minimizes work to flatten the sampled data for line-graphics
drawing thus improving refresh latency when drawing large downsampled
curves.
TL;DR:
- add `ShmArray.ustruct()` to return a **copy of** (since a view doesn't
work..) the (field filtered) shm array which is the same index-length
as the source data.
- update the OHLC ds curve with view aware data sliced out from the
pre-allocated and incrementally updated data (we had to add a last
index var `._iflat` to track appends - this should be moved into
a renderer eventually?).
This begins the removal of data processing / analysis methods from the
chart widget and instead moving them to our new `Flow` API (in the new
module introduce here) and delegating the old chart methods to the
respective internal flow. Most importantly is no longer storing the
"last read" of an array from shm in an internal chart table (was
`._arrays`) and instead the `ShmArray` instance is passed as input and
stored in the `Flow` instance. This greatly simplifies lookup logic such
that the display loop now doesn't have to worry about reading shm, it
can be done by internal graphics logic as desired. Generally speaking,
all previous `._arrays`/`._graphics` lookups are now delegated to the
entries in the chart's `._flows` table.
The new `Flow` methods are generally better factored and provide more
detailed output regarding data-stream <-> graphics inter-relations for
the future purpose of allowing much more efficient update calls in the
display loop as well as supporting low latency interaction UX.
The concept here is that we're introducing an intermediary layer that
ties together graphics and real-time data flows such that widget code is
oriented around plot layout and the flow apis are oriented around
real-time low latency updates and providing an efficient high level
metric layer for the UX.
The summary api transition is something like:
- `update_graphics_from_array()` -> `.update_graphics_from_flow()`
- `.bars_range()` -> `Flow.datums_range()`
- `.bars_range()` -> `Flow.datums_range()`
If `marketstore` is detected try to only load most recent missing data
from the data provider (broker) and the rest from the tsdb and push it
all to shm for display in the UI. If the provider/broker doesn't have
the history client endpoint, just use the old one for now so we can
start to incrementally add support. Don't start the ohlc step
incrementer task until the backend signals that the feed is live.
Add some basic `numpy` epoch slice logic to generate append and prepend
arrays to write to the db.
Mooar cool things,
- add a `Storage.delete_ts()` method to wipe a column series from the db
easily.
- don't attempt to read in any OHLC series by default on client load
- add some `pyqtgraph` profiling and drop manual latency measures
- if no db series for the fqsn exists write the entire shm array
Also, Start tinkering with `tractor.trionics.ipython_embed()`
In effort to get back to a usable REPL around the mkts client
this adds usage of the new `tractor` integration api as well as logic
for skipping backfilling if existing tsdb arrays are found.
Starts a wrapper around the `marketstore` client to do basic ohlcv query
and retrieval and prototypes out write methods for ohlc and tick.
Try to connect to `marketstore` automatically (which will fail if not
started currently) but we will eventually first do a service query.
Further:
- get `pikerd` working with and without `--tsdb` flag.
- support spawning `brokerd` with no real-time quotes.
- bring back in "fqsn" support that was originally not
in this history before commits factoring.
Tyler Goodlet