forked from goodboy/tractor
631 lines
25 KiB
ReStructuredText
631 lines
25 KiB
ReStructuredText
.. tractor documentation master file, created by
|
|
sphinx-quickstart on Sun Feb 9 22:26:51 2020.
|
|
You can adapt this file completely to your liking, but it should at least
|
|
contain the root `toctree` directive.
|
|
|
|
tractor
|
|
=======
|
|
A `structured concurrent`_, async-native "`actor model`_" built on trio_ and multiprocessing_.
|
|
|
|
.. toctree::
|
|
:maxdepth: 2
|
|
:caption: Contents:
|
|
|
|
.. _actor model: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actor_model
|
|
.. _trio: https://github.com/python-trio/trio
|
|
.. _multiprocessing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiprocessing
|
|
.. _trionic: https://trio.readthedocs.io/en/latest/design.html#high-level-design-principles
|
|
.. _async sandwich: https://trio.readthedocs.io/en/latest/tutorial.html#async-sandwich
|
|
.. _structured concurrent: https://trio.discourse.group/t/concise-definition-of-structured-concurrency/228
|
|
|
|
|
|
``tractor`` is an attempt to bring trionic_ `structured concurrency`_ to
|
|
distributed multi-core Python; it aims to be the Python multi-processing
|
|
framework *you always wanted*.
|
|
|
|
``tractor`` lets you spawn ``trio`` *"actors"*: processes which each run
|
|
a ``trio`` scheduled task tree (also known as an `async sandwich`_).
|
|
*Actors* communicate by exchanging asynchronous messages_ and avoid
|
|
sharing any state. This model allows for highly distributed software
|
|
architecture which works just as well on multiple cores as it does over
|
|
many hosts.
|
|
|
|
The first step to grok ``tractor`` is to get the basics of ``trio`` down.
|
|
A great place to start is the `trio docs`_ and this `blog post`_.
|
|
|
|
.. _messages: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Message_passing
|
|
.. _trio docs: https://trio.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
|
|
.. _blog post: https://vorpus.org/blog/notes-on-structured-concurrency-or-go-statement-considered-harmful/
|
|
.. _structured concurrency: https://vorpus.org/blog/notes-on-structured-concurrency-or-go-statement-considered-harmful/
|
|
|
|
|
|
Install
|
|
-------
|
|
No PyPi release yet!
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
pip install git+git://github.com/goodboy/tractor.git
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feel like saying hi?
|
|
--------------------
|
|
This project is very much coupled to the ongoing development of
|
|
``trio`` (i.e. ``tractor`` gets all its ideas from that brilliant
|
|
community). If you want to help, have suggestions or just want to
|
|
say hi, please feel free to ping me on the `trio gitter channel`_!
|
|
|
|
.. _trio gitter channel: https://gitter.im/python-trio/general
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. contents::
|
|
|
|
|
|
Philosophy
|
|
----------
|
|
Our tenets non-comprehensively include:
|
|
|
|
- strict adherence to the `concept-in-progress`_ of *structured concurrency*
|
|
- no spawning of processes *willy-nilly*; causality_ is paramount!
|
|
- (remote) errors `always propagate`_ back to the parent supervisor
|
|
- verbatim support for ``trio``'s cancellation_ system
|
|
- `shared nothing architecture`_
|
|
- no use of *proxy* objects or shared references between processes
|
|
- an immersive debugging experience
|
|
- anti-fragility through `chaos engineering`_
|
|
|
|
``tractor`` is an actor-model-*like* system in the sense that it adheres
|
|
to the `3 axioms`_ but does not (yet) fulfil all "unrequirements_" in
|
|
practise. It is an experiment in applying `structured concurrency`_
|
|
constraints on a parallel processing system where multiple Python
|
|
processes exist over many hosts but no process can outlive its parent.
|
|
In `erlang` parlance, it is an architecture where every process has
|
|
a mandatory supervisor enforced by the type system. The API design is
|
|
almost exclusively inspired by trio_'s concepts and primitives (though
|
|
we often lag a little). As a distributed computing system `tractor`
|
|
attempts to place sophistication at the correct layer such that
|
|
concurrency primitives are powerful yet simple, making it easy to build
|
|
complex systems (you can build a "worker pool" architecture but it's
|
|
definitely not required). There is first class support for inter-actor
|
|
streaming using `async generators`_ and ongoing work toward a functional
|
|
reactive style for IPC.
|
|
|
|
.. warning:: ``tractor`` is in alpha-alpha and is expected to change rapidly!
|
|
Expect nothing to be set in stone. Your ideas about where it should go
|
|
are greatly appreciated!
|
|
|
|
.. _concept-in-progress: https://trio.discourse.group/t/structured-concurrency-kickoff/55
|
|
.. _3 axioms: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actor_model#Fundamental_concepts
|
|
.. _unrequirements: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actor_model#Direct_communication_and_asynchrony
|
|
.. _async generators: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0525/
|
|
.. _always propagate: https://trio.readthedocs.io/en/latest/design.html#exceptions-always-propagate
|
|
.. _causality: https://vorpus.org/blog/some-thoughts-on-asynchronous-api-design-in-a-post-asyncawait-world/#c-c-c-c-causality-breaker
|
|
.. _shared nothing architecture: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared-nothing_architecture
|
|
.. _cancellation: https://trio.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reference-core.html#cancellation-and-timeouts
|
|
.. _channels: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Channel_(programming)
|
|
.. _chaos engineering: http://principlesofchaos.org/
|
|
|
|
|
|
Examples
|
|
--------
|
|
Note, if you are on Windows please be sure to see the gotchas section
|
|
before trying these.
|
|
|
|
|
|
A trynamic first scene
|
|
**********************
|
|
Let's direct a couple *actors* and have them run their lines for
|
|
the hip new film we're shooting:
|
|
|
|
.. literalinclude:: ../examples/a_trynamic_first_scene.py
|
|
|
|
We spawn two *actors*, *donny* and *gretchen*.
|
|
Each actor starts up and executes their *main task* defined by an
|
|
async function, ``say_hello()``. The function instructs each actor
|
|
to find their partner and say hello by calling their partner's
|
|
``hi()`` function using something called a *portal*. Each actor
|
|
receives a response and relays that back to the parent actor (in
|
|
this case our "director" executing ``main()``).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actor spawning and causality
|
|
****************************
|
|
``tractor`` tries to take ``trio``'s concept of causal task lifetimes
|
|
to multi-process land. Accordingly, ``tractor``'s *actor nursery* behaves
|
|
similar to ``trio``'s nursery_. That is, ``tractor.open_nursery()``
|
|
opens an ``ActorNursery`` which **must** wait on spawned *actors* to complete
|
|
(or error) in the same causal_ way ``trio`` waits on spawned subtasks.
|
|
This includes errors from any one actor causing all other actors
|
|
spawned by the same nursery to be cancelled_.
|
|
|
|
To spawn an actor and run a function in it, open a *nursery block*
|
|
and use the ``run_in_actor()`` method:
|
|
|
|
.. literalinclude:: ../examples/actor_spawning_and_causality.py
|
|
|
|
What's going on?
|
|
|
|
- an initial *actor* is started with ``tractor.run()`` and told to execute
|
|
its main task_: ``main()``
|
|
|
|
- inside ``main()`` an actor is *spawned* using an ``ActorNusery`` and is told
|
|
to run a single function: ``cellar_door()``
|
|
|
|
- a ``portal`` instance (we'll get to what it is shortly)
|
|
returned from ``nursery.run_in_actor()`` is used to communicate with
|
|
the newly spawned *sub-actor*
|
|
|
|
- the second actor, *some_linguist*, in a new *process* running a new ``trio`` task_
|
|
then executes ``cellar_door()`` and returns its result over a *channel* back
|
|
to the parent actor
|
|
|
|
- the parent actor retrieves the subactor's *final result* using ``portal.result()``
|
|
much like you'd expect from a future_.
|
|
|
|
This ``run_in_actor()`` API should look very familiar to users of
|
|
``asyncio``'s `run_in_executor()`_ which uses a ``concurrent.futures`` Executor_.
|
|
|
|
Since you might also want to spawn long running *worker* or *daemon*
|
|
actors, each actor's *lifetime* can be determined based on the spawn
|
|
method:
|
|
|
|
- if the actor is spawned using ``run_in_actor()`` it terminates when
|
|
its *main* task completes (i.e. when the (async) function submitted
|
|
to it *returns*). The ``with tractor.open_nursery()`` exits only once
|
|
all actors' main function/task complete (just like the nursery_ in ``trio``)
|
|
|
|
- actors can be spawned to *live forever* using the ``start_actor()``
|
|
method and act like an RPC daemon that runs indefinitely (the
|
|
``with tractor.open_nursery()`` won't exit) until cancelled_
|
|
|
|
Here is a similar example using the latter method:
|
|
|
|
.. code:: python
|
|
|
|
def movie_theatre_question():
|
|
"""A question asked in a dark theatre, in a tangent
|
|
(errr, I mean different) process.
|
|
"""
|
|
return 'have you ever seen a portal?'
|
|
|
|
|
|
async def main():
|
|
"""The main ``tractor`` routine.
|
|
"""
|
|
async with tractor.open_nursery() as n:
|
|
|
|
portal = await n.start_actor(
|
|
'frank',
|
|
# enable the actor to run funcs from this current module
|
|
rpc_module_paths=[__name__],
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
print(await portal.run(__name__, 'movie_theatre_question'))
|
|
# call the subactor a 2nd time
|
|
print(await portal.run(__name__, 'movie_theatre_question'))
|
|
|
|
# the async with will block here indefinitely waiting
|
|
# for our actor "frank" to complete, but since it's an
|
|
# "outlive_main" actor it will never end until cancelled
|
|
await portal.cancel_actor()
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ``rpc_module_paths`` `kwarg` above is a list of module path
|
|
strings that will be loaded and made accessible for execution in the
|
|
remote actor through a call to ``Portal.run()``. For now this is
|
|
a simple mechanism to restrict the functionality of the remote
|
|
(and possibly daemonized) actor and uses Python's module system to
|
|
limit the allowed remote function namespace(s).
|
|
|
|
``tractor`` is opinionated about the underlying threading model used for
|
|
each *actor*. Since Python has a GIL and an actor model by definition
|
|
shares no state between actors, it fits naturally to use a multiprocessing_
|
|
``Process``. This allows ``tractor`` programs to leverage not only multi-core
|
|
hardware but also distribute over many hardware hosts (each *actor* can talk
|
|
to all others with ease over standard network protocols).
|
|
|
|
.. _task: https://trio.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reference-core.html#tasks-let-you-do-multiple-things-at-once
|
|
.. _nursery: https://trio.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reference-core.html#nurseries-and-spawning
|
|
.. _causal: https://vorpus.org/blog/some-thoughts-on-asynchronous-api-design-in-a-post-asyncawait-world/#causality
|
|
.. _cancelled: https://trio.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reference-core.html#child-tasks-and-cancellation
|
|
.. _run_in_executor(): https://docs.python.org/3/library/asyncio-eventloop.html#asyncio.loop.run_in_executor
|
|
.. _Executor: https://docs.python.org/3/library/concurrent.futures.html#concurrent.futures.Executor
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancellation
|
|
************
|
|
``tractor`` supports ``trio``'s cancellation_ system verbatim.
|
|
Cancelling a nursery block cancels all actors spawned by it.
|
|
Eventually ``tractor`` plans to support different `supervision strategies`_ like ``erlang``.
|
|
|
|
.. _supervision strategies: http://erlang.org/doc/man/supervisor.html#sup_flags
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remote error propagation
|
|
************************
|
|
Any task invoked in a remote actor should ship any error(s) back to the calling
|
|
actor where it is raised and expected to be dealt with. This way remote actors
|
|
are never cancelled unless explicitly asked or there's a bug in ``tractor`` itself.
|
|
|
|
.. code:: python
|
|
|
|
async def assert_err():
|
|
assert 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
async def main():
|
|
async with tractor.open_nursery() as n:
|
|
real_actors = []
|
|
for i in range(3):
|
|
real_actors.append(await n.start_actor(
|
|
f'actor_{i}',
|
|
rpc_module_paths=[__name__],
|
|
))
|
|
|
|
# start one actor that will fail immediately
|
|
await n.run_in_actor('extra', assert_err)
|
|
|
|
# should error here with a ``RemoteActorError`` containing
|
|
# an ``AssertionError`` and all the other actors have been cancelled
|
|
|
|
try:
|
|
# also raises
|
|
tractor.run(main)
|
|
except tractor.RemoteActorError:
|
|
print("Look Maa that actor failed hard, hehhh!")
|
|
|
|
|
|
You'll notice the nursery cancellation conducts a *one-cancels-all*
|
|
supervisory strategy `exactly like trio`_. The plan is to add more
|
|
`erlang strategies`_ in the near future by allowing nurseries to accept
|
|
a ``Supervisor`` type.
|
|
|
|
.. _exactly like trio: https://trio.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reference-core.html#cancellation-semantics
|
|
.. _erlang strategies: http://learnyousomeerlang.com/supervisors
|
|
|
|
|
|
IPC using *portals*
|
|
*******************
|
|
``tractor`` introduces the concept of a *portal* which is an API
|
|
borrowed_ from ``trio``. A portal may seem similar to the idea of
|
|
a RPC future_ except a *portal* allows invoking remote *async* functions and
|
|
generators and intermittently blocking to receive responses. This allows
|
|
for fully async-native IPC between actors.
|
|
|
|
When you invoke another actor's routines using a *portal* it looks as though
|
|
it was called locally in the current actor. So when you see a call to
|
|
``await portal.run()`` what you get back is what you'd expect
|
|
to if you'd called the function directly in-process. This approach avoids
|
|
the need to add any special RPC *proxy* objects to the library by instead just
|
|
relying on the built-in (async) function calling semantics and protocols of Python.
|
|
|
|
Depending on the function type ``Portal.run()`` tries to
|
|
correctly interface exactly like a local version of the remote
|
|
built-in Python *function type*. Currently async functions, generators,
|
|
and regular functions are supported. Inspiration for this API comes
|
|
`remote function execution`_ but without the client code being
|
|
concerned about the underlying channels_ system or shipping code
|
|
over the network.
|
|
|
|
This *portal* approach turns out to be paricularly exciting with the
|
|
introduction of `asynchronous generators`_ in Python 3.6! It means that
|
|
actors can compose nicely in a data streaming pipeline.
|
|
|
|
.. _exactly like trio: https://trio.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reference-core.html#cancellation-semantics
|
|
|
|
Streaming
|
|
*********
|
|
By now you've figured out that ``tractor`` lets you spawn process based
|
|
*actors* that can invoke cross-process (async) functions and all with
|
|
structured concurrency built in. But the **real cool stuff** is the
|
|
native support for cross-process *streaming*.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asynchronous generators
|
|
+++++++++++++++++++++++
|
|
The default streaming function is simply an async generator definition.
|
|
Every value *yielded* from the generator is delivered to the calling
|
|
portal exactly like if you had invoked the function in-process meaning
|
|
you can ``async for`` to receive each value on the calling side.
|
|
|
|
As an example here's a parent actor that streams for 1 second from a
|
|
spawned subactor:
|
|
|
|
.. literalinclude:: ../examples/asynchronous_generators.py
|
|
|
|
By default async generator functions are treated as inter-actor
|
|
*streams* when invoked via a portal (how else could you really interface
|
|
with them anyway) so no special syntax to denote the streaming *service*
|
|
is necessary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Channels and Contexts
|
|
+++++++++++++++++++++
|
|
If you aren't fond of having to write an async generator to stream data
|
|
between actors (or need something more flexible) you can instead use
|
|
a ``Context``. A context wraps an actor-local spawned task and
|
|
a ``Channel`` so that tasks executing across multiple processes can
|
|
stream data to one another using a low level, request oriented API.
|
|
|
|
A ``Channel`` wraps an underlying *transport* and *interchange* format
|
|
to enable *inter-actor-communication*. In its present state ``tractor``
|
|
uses TCP and msgpack_.
|
|
|
|
As an example if you wanted to create a streaming server without writing
|
|
an async generator that *yields* values you instead define a decorated
|
|
async function:
|
|
|
|
.. code:: python
|
|
|
|
@tractor.stream
|
|
async def streamer(ctx: tractor.Context, rate: int = 2) -> None:
|
|
"""A simple web response streaming server.
|
|
"""
|
|
while True:
|
|
val = await web_request('http://data.feed.com')
|
|
|
|
# this is the same as ``yield`` in the async gen case
|
|
await ctx.send_yield(val)
|
|
|
|
await trio.sleep(1 / rate)
|
|
|
|
|
|
You must decorate the function with ``@tractor.stream`` and declare
|
|
a ``ctx`` argument as the first in your function signature and then
|
|
``tractor`` will treat the async function like an async generator - as
|
|
a stream from the calling/client side.
|
|
|
|
This turns out to be handy particularly if you have multiple tasks
|
|
pushing responses concurrently:
|
|
|
|
.. code:: python
|
|
|
|
async def streamer(
|
|
ctx: tractor.Context,
|
|
rate: int = 2
|
|
) -> None:
|
|
"""A simple web response streaming server.
|
|
"""
|
|
while True:
|
|
val = await web_request(url)
|
|
|
|
# this is the same as ``yield`` in the async gen case
|
|
await ctx.send_yield(val)
|
|
|
|
await trio.sleep(1 / rate)
|
|
|
|
|
|
@tractor.stream
|
|
async def stream_multiple_sources(
|
|
ctx: tractor.Context,
|
|
sources: List[str]
|
|
) -> None:
|
|
async with trio.open_nursery() as n:
|
|
for url in sources:
|
|
n.start_soon(streamer, ctx, url)
|
|
|
|
|
|
The context notion comes from the context_ in nanomsg_.
|
|
|
|
.. _context: https://nanomsg.github.io/nng/man/tip/nng_ctx.5
|
|
.. _msgpack: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MessagePack
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A full fledged streaming service
|
|
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
|
|
Alright, let's get fancy.
|
|
|
|
Say you wanted to spawn two actors which each pull data feeds from
|
|
two different sources (and wanted this work spread across 2 cpus).
|
|
You also want to aggregate these feeds, do some processing on them and then
|
|
deliver the final result stream to a client (or in this case parent) actor
|
|
and print the results to your screen:
|
|
|
|
.. literalinclude:: ../examples/full_fledged_streaming_service.py
|
|
|
|
Here there's four actors running in separate processes (using all the
|
|
cores on you machine). Two are streaming by *yielding* values from the
|
|
``stream_data()`` async generator, one is aggregating values from
|
|
those two in ``aggregate()`` (also an async generator) and shipping the
|
|
single stream of unique values up the parent actor (the ``'MainProcess'``
|
|
as ``multiprocessing`` calls it) which is running ``main()``.
|
|
|
|
.. _future: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Futures_and_promises
|
|
.. _borrowed:
|
|
https://trio.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reference-core.html#getting-back-into-the-trio-thread-from-another-thread
|
|
.. _asynchronous generators: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0525/
|
|
.. _remote function execution: https://codespeak.net/execnet/example/test_info.html#remote-exec-a-function-avoiding-inlined-source-part-i
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actor local variables
|
|
*********************
|
|
Although ``tractor`` uses a *shared-nothing* architecture between processes
|
|
you can of course share state between tasks running *within* an actor.
|
|
``trio`` tasks spawned via multiple RPC calls to an actor can access global
|
|
state using the per actor ``statespace`` dictionary:
|
|
|
|
.. code:: python
|
|
|
|
|
|
statespace = {'doggy': 10}
|
|
|
|
|
|
def check_statespace():
|
|
# Remember this runs in a new process so no changes
|
|
# will propagate back to the parent actor
|
|
assert tractor.current_actor().statespace == statespace
|
|
|
|
|
|
async def main():
|
|
async with tractor.open_nursery() as n:
|
|
await n.run_in_actor(
|
|
'checker',
|
|
check_statespace,
|
|
statespace=statespace
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of course you don't have to use the ``statespace`` variable (it's mostly
|
|
a convenience for passing simple data to newly spawned actors); building
|
|
out a state sharing system per-actor is totally up to you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service Discovery
|
|
*****************
|
|
Though it will be built out much more in the near future, ``tractor``
|
|
currently keeps track of actors by ``(name: str, id: str)`` using a
|
|
special actor called the *arbiter*. Currently the *arbiter* must exist
|
|
on a host (or it will be created if one can't be found) and keeps a
|
|
simple ``dict`` of actor names to sockets for discovery by other actors.
|
|
Obviously this can be made more sophisticated (help me with it!) but for
|
|
now it does the trick.
|
|
|
|
To find the arbiter from the current actor use the ``get_arbiter()`` function and to
|
|
find an actor's socket address by name use the ``find_actor()`` function:
|
|
|
|
.. literalinclude:: ../examples/service_discovery.py
|
|
|
|
The ``name`` value you should pass to ``find_actor()`` is the one you passed as the
|
|
*first* argument to either ``tractor.run()`` or ``ActorNursery.start_actor()``.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Running actors standalone
|
|
*************************
|
|
You don't have to spawn any actors using ``open_nursery()`` if you just
|
|
want to run a single actor that connects to an existing cluster.
|
|
All the comms and arbiter registration stuff still works. This can
|
|
somtimes turn out being handy when debugging mult-process apps when you
|
|
need to hop into a debugger. You just need to pass the existing
|
|
*arbiter*'s socket address you'd like to connect to:
|
|
|
|
.. code:: python
|
|
|
|
tractor.run(main, arbiter_addr=('192.168.0.10', 1616))
|
|
|
|
|
|
Choosing a process spawning backend
|
|
***********************************
|
|
``tractor`` is architected to support multiple actor (sub-process)
|
|
spawning backends. Specific defaults are chosen based on your system
|
|
but you can also explicitly select a backend of choice at startup
|
|
via a ``start_method`` kwarg to ``tractor.run()``.
|
|
|
|
Currently the options available are:
|
|
|
|
- ``trio_run_in_process``: a ``trio``-native spawner from the `Ethereum community`_
|
|
- ``spawn``: one of the stdlib's ``multiprocessing`` `start methods`_
|
|
- ``forkserver``: a faster ``multiprocessing`` variant that is Unix only
|
|
|
|
.. _start methods: https://docs.python.org/3.8/library/multiprocessing.html#contexts-and-start-methods
|
|
.. _Ethereum community : https://github.com/ethereum/trio-run-in-process
|
|
|
|
|
|
``trio-run-in-process``
|
|
+++++++++++++++++++++++
|
|
`trio-run-in-process`_ is a young "pure ``trio``" process spawner
|
|
which utilizes the native `trio subprocess APIs`_. It has shown great
|
|
reliability under testing for predictable teardown when launching
|
|
recursive pools of actors (multiple nurseries deep) and as such has been
|
|
chosen as the default backend on \*nix systems.
|
|
|
|
.. _trio-run-in-process: https://github.com/ethereum/trio-run-in-process
|
|
.. _trio subprocess APIs : https://trio.readthedocs.io/en/stable/reference-io.html#spawning-subprocesses
|
|
|
|
|
|
``multiprocessing``
|
|
+++++++++++++++++++
|
|
There is support for the stdlib's ``multiprocessing`` `start methods`_.
|
|
Note that on Windows *spawn* it the only supported method and on \*nix
|
|
systems *forkserver* is the best method for speed but has the caveat
|
|
that it will break easily (hangs due to broken pipes) if spawning actors
|
|
using nested nurseries.
|
|
|
|
In general, the ``multiprocessing`` backend **has not proven reliable**
|
|
for handling errors from actors more then 2 nurseries *deep* (see `#89`_).
|
|
If you for some reason need this consider sticking with alternative
|
|
backends.
|
|
|
|
.. _#89: https://github.com/goodboy/tractor/issues/89
|
|
|
|
Windows "gotchas"
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
On Windows (which requires the use of the stdlib's `multiprocessing`
|
|
package) there are some gotchas. Namely, the need for calling
|
|
`freeze_support()`_ inside the ``__main__`` context. Additionally you
|
|
may need place you `tractor` program entry point in a seperate
|
|
`__main__.py` module in your package in order to avoid an error like the
|
|
following ::
|
|
|
|
Traceback (most recent call last):
|
|
File "C:\ProgramData\Miniconda3\envs\tractor19030601\lib\site-packages\tractor\_actor.py", line 234, in _get_rpc_func
|
|
return getattr(self._mods[ns], funcname)
|
|
KeyError: '__mp_main__'
|
|
|
|
|
|
To avoid this, the following is the **only code** that should be in your
|
|
main python module of the program:
|
|
|
|
.. code:: python
|
|
|
|
# application/__main__.py
|
|
import tractor
|
|
import multiprocessing
|
|
from . import tractor_app
|
|
|
|
if __name__ == '__main__':
|
|
multiprocessing.freeze_support()
|
|
tractor.run(tractor_app.main)
|
|
|
|
And execute as::
|
|
|
|
python -m application
|
|
|
|
|
|
See `#61`_ and `#79`_ for further details.
|
|
|
|
.. _freeze_support(): https://docs.python.org/3/library/multiprocessing.html#multiprocessing.freeze_support
|
|
.. _#61: https://github.com/goodboy/tractor/pull/61#issuecomment-470053512
|
|
.. _#79: https://github.com/goodboy/tractor/pull/79
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enabling logging
|
|
****************
|
|
Considering how complicated distributed software can become it helps to know
|
|
what exactly it's doing (even at the lowest levels). Luckily ``tractor`` has
|
|
tons of logging throughout the core. ``tractor`` isn't opinionated on
|
|
how you use this information and users are expected to consume log messages in
|
|
whichever way is appropriate for the system at hand. That being said, when hacking
|
|
on ``tractor`` there is a prettified console formatter which you can enable to
|
|
see what the heck is going on. Just put the following somewhere in your code:
|
|
|
|
.. code:: python
|
|
|
|
from tractor.log import get_console_log
|
|
log = get_console_log('trace')
|
|
|
|
|
|
What the future holds
|
|
---------------------
|
|
Stuff I'd like to see ``tractor`` do real soon:
|
|
|
|
- TLS_, duh.
|
|
- erlang-like supervisors_
|
|
- native support for `nanomsg`_ as a channel transport
|
|
- native `gossip protocol`_ support for service discovery and arbiter election
|
|
- a distributed log ledger for tracking cluster behaviour
|
|
- a slick multi-process aware debugger much like in celery_
|
|
but with better `pdb++`_ support
|
|
- an extensive `chaos engineering`_ test suite
|
|
- support for reactive programming primitives and native support for asyncitertools_ like libs
|
|
- introduction of a `capability-based security`_ model
|
|
|
|
.. _TLS: https://trio.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reference-io.html#ssl-tls-support
|
|
.. _supervisors: https://github.com/goodboy/tractor/issues/22
|
|
.. _nanomsg: https://nanomsg.github.io/nng/index.html
|
|
.. _gossip protocol: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gossip_protocol
|
|
.. _celery: http://docs.celeryproject.org/en/latest/userguide/debugging.html
|
|
.. _asyncitertools: https://github.com/vodik/asyncitertools
|
|
.. _pdb++: https://github.com/antocuni/pdb
|
|
.. _capability-based security: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capability-based_security
|