Compare commits
2 Commits
ccb6f1913c
...
ca10029046
| Author | SHA1 | Date |
|---|---|---|
|
|
ca10029046 | |
|
|
7060faa58c |
|
|
@ -48,10 +48,11 @@ the market venue itself.
|
|||
a unified API for market data, order submission, and position
|
||||
tracking regardless of venue.
|
||||
|
||||
- A hyper performant real-time charting UI built on PyQt6 and our own
|
||||
extensions to the `PyQtGraph` graphic lib, all driven by
|
||||
in-shared-memory data (like OHLCV) buffers that multiple processes
|
||||
read without serialization overhead.
|
||||
- A hyper performant real-time charting UI built on `PyQt6` and our
|
||||
own extensions to the `PyQtGraph` graphic lib, all driven by
|
||||
real-time, in-shared-memory-buffer backed, data flows (i.e. OHLCV,
|
||||
market tick events, traffic profile metrics) that multiple
|
||||
processes (actors) operate on without serialization overhead.
|
||||
|
||||
- a keyboard-driven, modal UI/X targeting tiling window manager users
|
||||
on linux.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
|
|||
Structured to match NLNet's form fields:
|
||||
|
||||
- Proposal name: "piker: sovereign, structured-concurrent trading infrastructure for the commons"
|
||||
- Abstract: comprehensive description of what piker is today + 5 concrete deliverables for the grant
|
||||
- Relevant experience: your background with tractor/trio/structured concurrency ecosystem
|
||||
- Comparison: positions piker against proprietary platforms, permissively-licensed FOSS libraries, and
|
||||
institutional systems — hits NLNet's "market failure" framing hard
|
||||
- Technical challenges: 5 real engineering problems (distributed SC, zero-copy shm, broker heterogeneity, UI
|
||||
perf, reproducible packaging)
|
||||
- Ecosystem engagement: upstream contributions, Matrix community, pikers.dev self-hosting, open data
|
||||
formats, standards work
|
||||
- Budget: €50k breakdown across 7 task areas at €75/h
|
||||
|
||||
Key arguments aligned with NLNet Commons Fund mission:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Financial infrastructure as captured commons — the "market failure" framing NLNet explicitly looks for
|
||||
2. AGPLv3+ as the license that actually prevents enclosure (not MIT/Apache which they've seen fail)
|
||||
3. "Honest, open, inclusive, robust" — their exact language mapped onto piker's properties
|
||||
4. Zero-web / federated / your-hardware-your-data as data sovereignty
|
||||
5. tractor as a standalone commons contribution beyond just trading
|
||||
|
||||
Things you'll want to customize before submitting:
|
||||
- Your Matrix room URL
|
||||
- Budget amounts / hourly rate to match your actual needs
|
||||
- Contact info on the form itself
|
||||
- Whether to attach a demo screencast or architecture diagram
|
||||
- The AI disclosure section (they require it since we used AI to draft)
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue