Compare commits
No commits in common. "ca10029046475f35d4f145776c75b0840111c426" and "ccb6f1913c7c6130d8ce9b57aaa9810378dbeeb4" have entirely different histories.
ca10029046
...
ccb6f1913c
|
|
@ -48,11 +48,10 @@ the market venue itself.
|
||||||
a unified API for market data, order submission, and position
|
a unified API for market data, order submission, and position
|
||||||
tracking regardless of venue.
|
tracking regardless of venue.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- A hyper performant real-time charting UI built on `PyQt6` and our
|
- A hyper performant real-time charting UI built on PyQt6 and our own
|
||||||
own extensions to the `PyQtGraph` graphic lib, all driven by
|
extensions to the `PyQtGraph` graphic lib, all driven by
|
||||||
real-time, in-shared-memory-buffer backed, data flows (i.e. OHLCV,
|
in-shared-memory data (like OHLCV) buffers that multiple processes
|
||||||
market tick events, traffic profile metrics) that multiple
|
read without serialization overhead.
|
||||||
processes (actors) operate on without serialization overhead.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- a keyboard-driven, modal UI/X targeting tiling window manager users
|
- a keyboard-driven, modal UI/X targeting tiling window manager users
|
||||||
on linux.
|
on linux.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -1,27 +0,0 @@
|
||||||
Structured to match NLNet's form fields:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- Proposal name: "piker: sovereign, structured-concurrent trading infrastructure for the commons"
|
|
||||||
- Abstract: comprehensive description of what piker is today + 5 concrete deliverables for the grant
|
|
||||||
- Relevant experience: your background with tractor/trio/structured concurrency ecosystem
|
|
||||||
- Comparison: positions piker against proprietary platforms, permissively-licensed FOSS libraries, and
|
|
||||||
institutional systems — hits NLNet's "market failure" framing hard
|
|
||||||
- Technical challenges: 5 real engineering problems (distributed SC, zero-copy shm, broker heterogeneity, UI
|
|
||||||
perf, reproducible packaging)
|
|
||||||
- Ecosystem engagement: upstream contributions, Matrix community, pikers.dev self-hosting, open data
|
|
||||||
formats, standards work
|
|
||||||
- Budget: €50k breakdown across 7 task areas at €75/h
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Key arguments aligned with NLNet Commons Fund mission:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
1. Financial infrastructure as captured commons — the "market failure" framing NLNet explicitly looks for
|
|
||||||
2. AGPLv3+ as the license that actually prevents enclosure (not MIT/Apache which they've seen fail)
|
|
||||||
3. "Honest, open, inclusive, robust" — their exact language mapped onto piker's properties
|
|
||||||
4. Zero-web / federated / your-hardware-your-data as data sovereignty
|
|
||||||
5. tractor as a standalone commons contribution beyond just trading
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Things you'll want to customize before submitting:
|
|
||||||
- Your Matrix room URL
|
|
||||||
- Budget amounts / hourly rate to match your actual needs
|
|
||||||
- Contact info on the form itself
|
|
||||||
- Whether to attach a demo screencast or architecture diagram
|
|
||||||
- The AI disclosure section (they require it since we used AI to draft)
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue