Extract and fork `pyqtgraph` upstream submissions

Fork out our patch set submitted to upstream in multiple PRs (since they
aren't moving and/or aren't a priority to core) which can be seen in
full from the following diff:
https://github.com/pyqtgraph/pyqtgraph/compare/master...pikers:pyqtgraph:graphics_pin

Move these type extensions into the internal `.ui._pg_overrides` module.

The changes are related to both `pyqtgraph.PlotItem` and `.AxisItem` and
were driven for our need for multi-view overlays (overlaid charts with
optionally synced axis and interaction controls) as documented in the PR
to upstream: https://github.com/pyqtgraph/pyqtgraph/pull/2162

More specifically,
- wrt to `AxisItem` we added lru caching of tick values as per:
  https://github.com/pyqtgraph/pyqtgraph/pull/2160.
- wrt to `PlotItem` we adjusted some of the axis management code, namely
  adding a standalone `.removeAxis()` and modifying the `.setAxisItems()` logic
  to use it in: https://github.com/pyqtgraph/pyqtgraph/pull/2162
  as well as some tweaks to `.updateGrid()` to loop through all possible
  axes when grid setting.
pg_exts_fork
Tyler Goodlet 2022-10-31 09:37:32 -04:00
parent d46945cb09
commit b524ea5c22
1 changed files with 273 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -15,11 +15,16 @@
# along with this program. If not, see <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
"""
Customization of ``pyqtgraph`` core routines to speed up our use mostly
based on not requiring "scentific precision" for pixel perfect view
transforms.
Customization of ``pyqtgraph`` core routines and various types normally
for speedups.
Generally, our does not require "scentific precision" for pixel perfect
view transforms.
"""
import functools
from typing import Optional
import pyqtgraph as pg
@ -46,3 +51,268 @@ def _do_overrides() -> None:
"""
# we don't care about potential fp issues inside Qt
pg.functions.invertQTransform = invertQTransform
pg.PlotItem = PlotItem
pg.AxisItem = AxisItem
# NOTE: the below customized type contains all our changes on a method
# by method basis as per the diff:
# https://github.com/pyqtgraph/pyqtgraph/commit/8e60bc14234b6bec1369ff4192dbfb82f8682920#diff-a2b5865955d2ba703dbc4c35ff01aa761aa28d2aeaac5e68d24e338bc82fb5b1R500
class PlotItem(pg.PlotItem):
'''
Overrides for the core plot object mostly pertaining to overlayed
multi-view management as it relates to multi-axis managment.
'''
def __init__(
self,
parent=None,
name=None,
labels=None,
title=None,
viewBox=None,
axisItems=None,
default_axes=['left', 'bottom'],
enableMenu=True,
**kargs
):
super().__init__(
parent=parent,
name=name,
labels=labels,
title=title,
viewBox=viewBox,
axisItems=axisItems,
# default_axes=default_axes,
enableMenu=enableMenu,
kargs=kargs,
)
# self.setAxisItems(
# axisItems,
# default_axes=default_axes,
# )
# NOTE: this is an entirely new method not in upstream.
def removeAxis(
self,
name: str,
unlink: bool = True,
) -> Optional[pg.AxisItem]:
"""
Remove an axis from the contained axis items
by ```name: str```.
This means the axis graphics object will be removed
from the ``.layout: QGraphicsGridLayout`` as well as unlinked
from the underlying associated ``ViewBox``.
If the ``unlink: bool`` is set to ``False`` then the axis will
stay linked to its view and will only be removed from the
layoutonly be removed from the layout.
If no axis with ``name: str`` is found then this is a noop.
Return the axis instance that was removed.
"""
entry = self.axes.pop(name, None)
if not entry:
return
axis = entry['item']
self.layout.removeItem(axis)
axis.scene().removeItem(axis)
if unlink:
axis.unlinkFromView()
self.update()
return axis
# Why do we need to always have all axes created?
#
# I don't understand this at all.
#
# Everything seems to work if you just always apply the
# set passed to this method **EXCEPT** for some super weird reason
# the view box geometry still computes as though the space for the
# `'bottom'` axis is always there **UNLESS** you always add that
# axis but hide it?
#
# Why in tf would this be the case!?!?
def setAxisItems(
self,
# XXX: yeah yeah, i know we can't use type annots like this yet.
axisItems: Optional[dict[str, pg.AxisItem]] = None,
add_to_layout: bool = True,
default_axes: list[str] = ['left', 'bottom'],
):
"""
Override axis item setting to only
"""
axisItems = axisItems or {}
# XXX: wth is is this even saying?!?
# Array containing visible axis items
# Also containing potentially hidden axes, but they are not
# touched so it does not matter
# visibleAxes = ['left', 'bottom']
# Note that it does not matter that this adds
# some values to visibleAxes a second time
# XXX: uhhh wat^ ..?
visibleAxes = list(default_axes) + list(axisItems.keys())
# TODO: we should probably invert the loop here to not loop the
# predefined "axis name set" and instead loop the `axisItems`
# input and lookup indices from a predefined map.
for name, pos in (
('top', (1, 1)),
('bottom', (3, 1)),
('left', (2, 0)),
('right', (2, 2))
):
if (
name in self.axes and
name in axisItems
):
# we already have an axis entry for this name
# so remove the existing entry.
self.removeAxis(name)
# elif name not in axisItems:
# # this axis entry is not provided in this call
# # so remove any old/existing entry.
# self.removeAxis(name)
# Create new axis
if name in axisItems:
axis = axisItems[name]
if axis.scene() is not None:
if (
name not in self.axes
or axis != self.axes[name]["item"]
):
raise RuntimeError(
"Can't add an axis to multiple plots. Shared axes"
" can be achieved with multiple AxisItem instances"
" and set[X/Y]Link.")
else:
# Set up new axis
# XXX: ok but why do we want to add axes for all entries
# if not desired by the user? The only reason I can see
# adding this is without it there's some weird
# ``ViewBox`` geometry bug.. where a gap for the
# 'bottom' axis is somehow left in?
axis = AxisItem(orientation=name, parent=self)
axis.linkToView(self.vb)
# XXX: shouldn't you already know the ``pos`` from the name?
# Oh right instead of a global map that would let you
# reasily look that up it's redefined over and over and over
# again in methods..
self.axes[name] = {'item': axis, 'pos': pos}
# NOTE: in the overlay case the axis may be added to some
# other layout and should not be added here.
if add_to_layout:
self.layout.addItem(axis, *pos)
# place axis above images at z=0, items that want to draw
# over the axes should be placed at z>=1:
axis.setZValue(0.5)
axis.setFlag(
axis.GraphicsItemFlag.ItemNegativeZStacksBehindParent
)
if name in visibleAxes:
self.showAxis(name, True)
else:
# why do we need to insert all axes to ``.axes`` and
# only hide the ones the user doesn't specify? It all
# seems to work fine without doing this except for this
# weird gap for the 'bottom' axis that always shows up
# in the view box geometry??
self.hideAxis(name)
def updateGrid(
self,
*args,
):
alpha = self.ctrl.gridAlphaSlider.value()
x = alpha if self.ctrl.xGridCheck.isChecked() else False
y = alpha if self.ctrl.yGridCheck.isChecked() else False
for name, dim in (
('top', x),
('bottom', x),
('left', y),
('right', y)
):
if name in self.axes:
self.getAxis(name).setGrid(dim)
# self.getAxis('bottom').setGrid(x)
# self.getAxis('left').setGrid(y)
# self.getAxis('right').setGrid(y)
# NOTE: overrides to lru_cache the ``.tickStrings()`` output.
class AxisItem(pg.AxisItem):
def __init__(
self,
orientation,
pen=None,
textPen=None,
linkView=None,
parent=None,
maxTickLength=-5,
showValues=True,
text='',
units='',
unitPrefix='',
lru_cache_tick_strings: bool = True,
**args,
):
super().__init__(
orientation=orientation,
pen=pen,
textPen=textPen,
linkView=linkView,
maxTickLength=maxTickLength,
showValues=showValues,
text=text,
units=units,
unitPrefix=unitPrefix,
parent=parent,
)
if lru_cache_tick_strings:
self.tickStrings = functools.lru_cache(
maxsize=2**20
)(self.tickStrings)
def tickValues(
self,
minVal: float,
maxVal: float,
size: int,
) -> list[tuple[float, tuple[str]]]:
'''
Repack tick values into tuples for lru caching.
'''
ticks = []
for scalar, values in super().tickValues(minVal, maxVal, size):
ticks.append((
scalar,
tuple(values), # this
))
return ticks