If the one side of an inter-actor context cancels the other then that
side should always expect back a `ContextCancelled` message. However we
should not set this error in this case (where the cancel request was
sent and a `ContextCancelled` msg was received back) since it may
override some other error that caused the cancellation request to be
sent out in the first place. As an example when a context opens another
context to a peer and some error happens which causes the second peer
context to be cancelled but we want to propagate the original error.
Fixes the issue found in https://github.com/pikers/piker/issues/244
This commit obviously denotes a re-license of all applicable parts of
the code base. Acknowledgement of this change was completed in #274 by
the majority of the current set of contributors. From here henceforth
all changes will be AGPL licensed and distributed. This is purely an
effort to maintain the same copy-left policy whilst closing the
(perceived) SaaS loophole the GPL allows for. It is merely for this
loophole: to avoid code hiding by any potential "network providers" who
are attempting to use the project to make a profit without either
compensating the authors or re-distributing their changes.
I thought quite a bit about this change and can't see a reason not to
close the SaaS loophole in our current license. We still are (hard)
copy-left and I plan to keep the code base this way for a couple
reasons:
- The code base produces income/profit through parent projects and is
demonstrably of high value.
- I believe firms should not get free lunch for the sake of
"contributions from their employees" or "usage as a service" which
I have found to be a dubious argument at best.
- If a firm who intends to profit from the code base wants to use it
they can propose a secondary commercial license to purchase with the
proceeds going to the project's authors under some form of well
defined contract.
- Many successful projects like Qt use this model; I see no reason it
can't work in this case until such a time as the authors feel it
should be loosened.
There has been detailed discussion in #103 on licensing alternatives.
The main point of this AGPL change is to protect the code base for the
time being from exploitation while it grows and as we move into the next
phase of development which will include extension into the multi-host
distributed software space.
A context method handling all this logic makes the most sense since it
contains all the state related to whether the error should be raised in
a nursery scope or is expected to be raised by a consumer task which
reads and processes the msg directly (via a `Portal` API call). This
also makes it easy to always process remote errors even when there is no
(stream) overrun condition.
Keeping it disabled on context open will help with detecting any stream
connection which was never opened on one side of the task pair. In that
case we can report that there was an overrun **and** a stream wasn't
opened versus if the stream is explicitly configured not to use bp then
we throw the standard overflow.
Use `trio.Nursery._closed` to detect "closure" XD since it seems to be
the most reliable way to determine if a spawn call will trigger
a runtime error.
In preparation for supporting both backpressure detection (through an
optional error) as well as control over the msg channel buffer size, add
internal configuration flags for both to contexts. Also adjust
`Context._err_on_from_remote_msg()` -> `._maybe..` such that it can be
called and will only raise if a scope nursery has been set. Add
a `Context._error` for stashing the remote task's error that may be
delivered in an `'error'` message.
This more formally declares the runtime's remote task startingn API
and uses it throughout all the dependent `Portal` API methods.
Allows dropping `Portal._submit()` and simplifying `.run_in_actor()`
style result waiting to be delegated to the context APIs at remote
task `return` response time. We now also track the remote entrypoint
"type` as `Context._remote_func_type`.
Instead of tracking feeder mem chans per RPC dialog, store `Context`
instances which (now) hold refs to the underlying RPC-task feeder chans
and track them inside a `Actor._contexts` map. This begins a transition
to making the "context" idea the primitive abstraction for representing
messaging dialogs between tasks in different memory domains (i.e.
usually separate processes).
A slew of changes made this possible:
- change `Actor.get_memchans()` -> `.get_context()`.
- Add new `Context._send_chan` and `._recv_chan` vars.
- implicitly create a new context on every `Actor.send_cmd()` call.
- use the context created by `.send_cmd()` in `Portal.open_context()`
instead of manually creating one.
- call `Actor.get_context()` inside tasks run from `._invoke()`
such that feeder chans are implicitly created for callee tasks
thus fixing the bug #265.
NB: We might change some of the internal semantics to do with *when* the
feeder chans are actually created to denote whether or not a far end
task is actually *read to receive* messages. For example, in the cases
where it **never** will be ready to receive messages (one-way streaming,
a context that never opens a stream, etc.) we will likely want some kind
of error or at least warning to the caller that messages can't be sent
(yet).
Previously we were ignoring a race where the callee an opened task
context could enter `Context.open_stream()` before calling `.started().
Disallow this as well as calling `.started()` more then once.
Now that we're on our way to a (somewhat) serious beta release I think
it's about time to start de-noising the logging emissions. Since we're
trying out this approach of "stack layer oriented" log levels, I figured
this is a good time to move most of the "warnings" to what they should
be: cancellation monitoring status messages. The level is set to 16
which is just above our "runtime" level but just below the traditional
"info" level. I think this will be a decent approach since usually if
you're confused about why your `tractor` app is behaving unlike you
expect, it's 90% of the time going to be to do with cancellation or
error propagation. This this setup a user can specify the 'cancel' level
and see all the msgs pertaining to both actor and task-in-actor
cancellation mechanics.
- drop `shield` input to `MsgStream`
- check for cancel called prior to loading the feeder mem chan
in `Context.open_stream()`
- warn on a timeout when trying to cancel a remote task from
`Context.cancel()`
- drop noop endofchannel handler block
This allows for wrapping an existing stream by re-assigning its receive
method to the allocated broadcaster's `.receive()` so as to avoid
expecting any original consumer(s) of the stream to now know about the
broadcaster; this instead mutates the stream to delegate to the new
receive call behind the scenes any time `.subscribe()` is called.
Add a `typing.Protocol` for so called "cloneable channels" until we
decide/figure out a better keying system for each subscription and
mask all undesired typing failures.
Add `ReceiveMsgStream.subscribe()` which allows allocating a broadcast
receiver around the stream for use by multiple actor-local consumer
tasks. Entering this context manager idempotently mutates the stream's
receive machinery which for now can not be undone. Move `.clone()` to
the receive stream type.
Resolves#204
The whole origin was not having an explicit open/close semantic for
streams. We have that now so this internal mechanic isn't needed and
further our streams become more correct by having `.aclose()` be
independent of cancellation.
Another face palm that was causing serious issues for code that is using
the `.shielded` feature..
Add a bunch more detailed comments for all this subtlety and hopefully
get it right once and for all. Also aggregated the `trio` errors that
should trigger closure inside `.aclose()`, hopefully that's right too.
Revert this change since it really is poking at internals and doesn't
make a lot of sense. If the context is going to be cancelled then the
msg loop will tear down the feed memory channel when ready, we don't
need to be clobbering it and confusing the runtime machinery lol.
Add clear teardown semantics for `Context` such that the remote side
cancellation propagation happens only on error or if client code
explicitly requests it (either by exit flag to `Portal.open_context()`
or by manually calling `Context.cancel()`). Add `Context.result()`
to wait on and capture the final result from a remote context function;
any lingering msg sequence will be consumed/discarded.
Changes in order to make this possible:
- pass the runtime msg loop's feeder receive channel in to the context
on the calling (portal opening) side such that a final 'return' msg
can be waited upon using `Context.result()` which delivers the final
return value from the callee side `@tractor.context` async function.
- always await a final result from the target context function in
`Portal.open_context()`'s `__aexit__()` if the context has not
been (requested to be) cancelled by client code on block exit.
- add an internal `Context._cancel_called` for context "cancel
requested" tracking (much like `trio`'s cancel scope).
- allow flagging a stream as terminated using an internal
`._eoc` flag which will mark the stream as stopped for iteration.
- drop `StopAsyncIteration` catching in `.receive()`; it does
nothing.
This mostly adds the api described in
https://github.com/goodboy/tractor/issues/53#issuecomment-806258798
The first draft summary:
- formalize bidir steaming using the `trio.Channel` style interface
which we derive as a `MsgStream` type.
- add `Portal.open_context()` which provides a `trio.Nursery.start()`
remote task invocation style for setting up and tearing down tasks
contexts in remote actors.
- add a distinct `'started'` message to the ipc protocol to facilitate
`Context.start()` with a first return value.
- for our `ReceiveMsgStream` type, don't cancel the remote task in
`.aclose()`; this is now done explicitly by the surrounding `Context`
usage: `Context.cancel()`.
- streams in either direction still use a `'yield'` message keeping the
proto mostly symmetric without having to worry about which side is the
caller / portal opener.
- subtlety: only allow sending a `'stop'` message during a 2-way
streaming context from `ReceiveStream.aclose()`, detailed comment
with explanation is included.
Relates to #53
Move receive stream into streaming modules and rebrand as a "message
stream". Factor out cancellation mechanics in `.aclose()` into the
`Context` type which will soon provide the api for for cancelling portal
invocations. Comment-stage a few methods on both types in anticipation
of a new bi-directional streaming api. Add a `MsgStream` bidirectional
channel type which will be the eventual type yielded from
`Context.open_stream()`. Adjust the response/dialog types to be the set
`{'asyncfun', 'asyncgen', 'context'}`. OH, and add async func checking
in `Portal.run()` to catch and error on sync funcs early.
Add `@tractor.stream` which must be used to denote non async generator
streaming functions which use the `tractor.Context` API to push values.
This enforces a more explicit denotation as well as allows enforcing the
declaration of the `ctx` argument in definitions.
Tyler Goodlet
Tyler Goodlet