If the root calls `trio.Process.kill()` on immediate child proc teardown
when the child is using pdb, we can get stdstreams clobbering that
results in a pdb++ repl where the user can't see what's been typed. Not
killing such children on cancellation / error seems to resolve this
issue whilst still giving reliable termination. For now, code that
special path until a time it becomes a problem for ensuring zombie
reaps.
Clearly this wasn't developed against a task that spawned just an async
func in `asyncio`.. Fix all that and remove a bunch of unnecessary func
layers. Add provisional support for the target receiving the `to_trio`
and `from_trio` channels and for the @tractor.stream marker.
The function is useful if you want to run the "main process" under
`asyncio`. Until `trio` core wraps this better we'll keep our own copy
in the interim (there's a new "inside-out-guest" mode almost on
mainline so hang tight).
This should mostly maintain top level SC principles for any task spawned
using `tractor.to_asyncio.run()`. When the `asyncio` task completes make
sure to cancel the pertaining `trio` cancel scope and raise any error
that may have resulted.
Resolves#120
Since it seems we're building out more and more higher level primitives
in order to support certain parallel style actor trees and messaging
patterns (eg. task broadcast channels), we might as well start a new
sub-package for purely `trio` constructions. We hereby dub this
the realm of `trionics` (like electronics but for trios instead of
electrons).
To kick things off, add an `async_enter_all()` concurrent
exit-stack-like context manager API which will concurrently spawn
a sequence of provided async context managers and deliver their ordered
results but with proper support for `trio` cancellation semantics.
The stdlib's `AsyncExitStack` is not compatible with nurseries not
`trio` tasks (which are cancelled) since as task will be suspended on
the stack after push and does not ever hit a checkpoint until the stack
is closed.
Now that we're on our way to a (somewhat) serious beta release I think
it's about time to start de-noising the logging emissions. Since we're
trying out this approach of "stack layer oriented" log levels, I figured
this is a good time to move most of the "warnings" to what they should
be: cancellation monitoring status messages. The level is set to 16
which is just above our "runtime" level but just below the traditional
"info" level. I think this will be a decent approach since usually if
you're confused about why your `tractor` app is behaving unlike you
expect, it's 90% of the time going to be to do with cancellation or
error propagation. This this setup a user can specify the 'cancel' level
and see all the msgs pertaining to both actor and task-in-actor
cancellation mechanics.
The stdlib's `logging.LoggingAdapter` doesn't currently pass through
`stacklevel: int` down to its wrapped logger instance. Hack it here
and get our msgs looking like they would if using a built-in level.
Tyler Goodlet
goodboy