With the new fixes to the trio spawner we can expect that both root
*and* depth > 1 nursery owning actors will now not clobber any children
that are in debug (either via breakpoint or through crashing). The tests
changed now include more checks which ensure the 2nd level parent-ish
actors also bubble up through into `pdb` and don't kill any of their
(crashed) children before they're done themselves debugging.
This is a draft of the `tractor` way to implement the example from the
"processs pool" in the stdlib's `concurrent.futures` docs:
https://docs.python.org/3/library/concurrent.futures.html#processpoolexecutor-example
Our runtime is of course slower to startup but once up we of course get
the same performance, this confirms that we need to focus some effort
not on warm up and teardown times. The mp forkserver method definitely
improves startup delay; rolling our own will likely be a good hot spot
to play with.
What's really nice is our implementation is done in approx 10th the code ;)
Also, do we want offer and interface that yields results as they arrive?
Relates to #175
This resolves and completes #69 allowing all RPC invocation APIs to pass
function references directly instead of explicit `str` names for the
target namespace and function (this is still done implicitly
underneath). This brings us closer to `trio`'s task running API as well
as acknowledges that any inter-host RPC system (and API) will likely
need to be implemented on top of local RPC primitives anyway. Even if
this ends up **not** being true we can always go to "function stubs" as
part of our IAC protocol or, add a new method to do explicit namespace
calls: `.run_from_module()` or whatever everyone votes on.
Resolves#69
Further, this commit drops `Actor.statespace` from the entire system
since a user can easily get this same functionality using module
level variables. Fix docs to match all these changes (luckily mostly
already done due to example scripts referencing).
Parametrize our docs example test to include all (now fixed) examples
from the `READ.rst`. The examples themselves have been fixed/corrected
to run but they haven't yet been updated in the actual docs. Once #99
lands these example scripts will be directly included in our
documentation so there will be no possibility of presenting incorrect
examples to our users! This technically fixes#108 even though the new
example aren't going to be included directly in our docs until #99
lands.
Apply the fix from @chrizzFTD where we invoke the entry point using
module exec mode on a ``__main__.py`` and import the
``test_example::`main()` from within that entry point script.
A per #98 we need tests for examples from the docs as they would be run
by a user copy and pasting the code. This adds a small system for loading
examples from an "examples/" directory and executing them in
a subprocess while checking the output. We can use this to also verify
end-to-end expected logging output on std streams (ex. logging on
stderr).
To expand this further we can parameterize the test list using the
contents of the examples directory instead of hardcoding the script
names as I've done here initially.
Also, fix up the current readme examples to have the required/proper `if
__name__ == '__main__'` script guard.
Tyler Goodlet