parent
c0276c85df
commit
e560322b9b
15
README.rst
15
README.rst
|
@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ Actor spawning and causality
|
||||||
``tractor`` tries to take ``trio``'s concept of causal task lifetimes
|
``tractor`` tries to take ``trio``'s concept of causal task lifetimes
|
||||||
to multi-process land. Accordingly, ``tractor``'s *actor nursery* behaves
|
to multi-process land. Accordingly, ``tractor``'s *actor nursery* behaves
|
||||||
similar to ``trio``'s nursery_. That is, ``tractor.open_nursery()``
|
similar to ``trio``'s nursery_. That is, ``tractor.open_nursery()``
|
||||||
opens an ``ActorNursery`` which waits on spawned *actors* to complete
|
opens an ``ActorNursery`` which **must** wait on spawned *actors* to complete
|
||||||
(or error) in the same causal_ way ``trio`` waits on spawned subtasks.
|
(or error) in the same causal_ way ``trio`` waits on spawned subtasks.
|
||||||
This includes errors from any one actor causing all other actors
|
This includes errors from any one actor causing all other actors
|
||||||
spawned by the same nursery to be cancelled_.
|
spawned by the same nursery to be cancelled_.
|
||||||
|
@ -181,14 +181,13 @@ and use the ``run_in_actor()`` method:
|
||||||
"""
|
"""
|
||||||
async with tractor.open_nursery() as n:
|
async with tractor.open_nursery() as n:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
portal = await n.run_in_actor('teacher', cellar_door)
|
portal = await n.run_in_actor('some_linguist', cellar_door)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# The ``async with`` will unblock here since the 'frank'
|
# The ``async with`` will unblock here since the 'some_linguist'
|
||||||
# actor has completed its main task ``movie_theatre_question()``.
|
# actor has completed its main task ``cellar_door``.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
print(await portal.result())
|
print(await portal.result())
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
tractor.run(main)
|
tractor.run(main)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -204,11 +203,11 @@ What's going on?
|
||||||
returned from ``nursery.run_in_actor()`` is used to communicate with
|
returned from ``nursery.run_in_actor()`` is used to communicate with
|
||||||
the newly spawned *sub-actor*
|
the newly spawned *sub-actor*
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- the second actor, *frank*, in a new *process* running a new ``trio`` task_
|
- the second actor, *some_linguist*, in a new *process* running a new ``trio`` task_
|
||||||
then executes ``cellar_door()`` and returns its result over a *channel* back
|
then executes ``cellar_door()`` and returns its result over a *channel* back
|
||||||
to the parent actor
|
to the parent actor
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- the parent actor retrieves the subactor's (*frank*) *final result* using ``portal.result()``
|
- the parent actor retrieves the subactor's *final result* using ``portal.result()``
|
||||||
much like you'd expect from a future_.
|
much like you'd expect from a future_.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
This ``run_in_actor()`` API should look very familiar to users of
|
This ``run_in_actor()`` API should look very familiar to users of
|
||||||
|
@ -227,7 +226,7 @@ method:
|
||||||
method and act like an RPC daemon that runs indefinitely (the
|
method and act like an RPC daemon that runs indefinitely (the
|
||||||
``with tractor.open_nursery()`` won't exit) until cancelled_
|
``with tractor.open_nursery()`` won't exit) until cancelled_
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Had we wanted the latter form in our example it would have looked like:
|
Here is a similar example using the latter method:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
.. code:: python
|
.. code:: python
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue