Ensure ctx error-state matches the MTE scenario
Namely checking that `Context._remote_error` is set to the raised MTE in the invalid started and return value cases since prior to the recent underlying changes to the `Context.result()` impl, it would not match. Further, - do asserts for non-MTE raising cases in both the parent and child. - add todos for testing ctx-outcomes for per-side-validation policies i anticipate supporting and implied msg-dialog race cases therein.runtime_to_msgspec
parent
6a4ee461f5
commit
4fa71cc01c
|
@ -148,12 +148,44 @@ async def child(
|
|||
# propagate to parent?
|
||||
if raise_on_started_mte:
|
||||
raise
|
||||
else:
|
||||
if expect_started_mte:
|
||||
raise RuntimeError(
|
||||
'Child-ctx-task SHOULD HAVE raised an MTE for\n\n'
|
||||
f'{started_value!r}\n'
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# no-send-side-error fallthrough
|
||||
if (
|
||||
validate_pld_spec
|
||||
and
|
||||
expect_started_mte
|
||||
):
|
||||
raise RuntimeError(
|
||||
'Child-ctx-task SHOULD HAVE raised an MTE for\n\n'
|
||||
f'{started_value!r}\n'
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
not expect_started_mte
|
||||
or
|
||||
not validate_pld_spec
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# if wait_for_parent_to_cancel:
|
||||
# ...
|
||||
#
|
||||
# ^-TODO-^ logic for diff validation policies on each side:
|
||||
#
|
||||
# -[ ] ensure that if we don't validate on the send
|
||||
# side, that we are eventually error-cancelled by our
|
||||
# parent due to the bad `Started` payload!
|
||||
# -[ ] the boxed error should be srced from the parent's
|
||||
# runtime NOT ours!
|
||||
# -[ ] we should still error on bad `return_value`s
|
||||
# despite the parent not yet error-cancelling us?
|
||||
# |_ how do we want the parent side to look in that
|
||||
# case?
|
||||
# -[ ] maybe the equiv of "during handling of the
|
||||
# above error another occurred" for the case where
|
||||
# the parent sends a MTE to this child and while
|
||||
# waiting for the child to terminate it gets back
|
||||
# the MTE for this case?
|
||||
#
|
||||
|
||||
# XXX should always fail on recv side since we can't
|
||||
# really do much else beside terminate and relay the
|
||||
|
@ -247,13 +279,17 @@ def test_basic_payload_spec(
|
|||
msg_type_str: str = ''
|
||||
bad_value_str: str = ''
|
||||
|
||||
maybe_mte: MsgTypeError|None = None
|
||||
should_raise: Exception|None = (
|
||||
MsgTypeError if (
|
||||
invalid_return
|
||||
or
|
||||
invalid_started
|
||||
) else None
|
||||
)
|
||||
async with (
|
||||
maybe_expect_raises(
|
||||
raises=MsgTypeError if (
|
||||
invalid_return
|
||||
or
|
||||
invalid_started
|
||||
) else None,
|
||||
raises=should_raise,
|
||||
ensure_in_message=[
|
||||
f"invalid `{msg_type_str}` payload",
|
||||
f"value: `{bad_value_str}` does not match type-spec: `{msg_type_str}.pld: PldMsg|NoneType`",
|
||||
|
@ -274,18 +310,35 @@ def test_basic_payload_spec(
|
|||
assert first.field == 'yo'
|
||||
|
||||
try:
|
||||
assert (await ctx.result()) is None
|
||||
res: None|PldMsg = await ctx.result(hide_tb=False)
|
||||
assert res is None
|
||||
except MsgTypeError as mte:
|
||||
maybe_mte = mte
|
||||
if not invalid_return:
|
||||
raise
|
||||
|
||||
else: # expected this invalid `Return.pld`
|
||||
assert mte.cid == ctx.cid
|
||||
# expected this invalid `Return.pld` so audit
|
||||
# the error state + meta-data
|
||||
assert mte.expected_msg_type is Return
|
||||
assert mte.cid == ctx.cid
|
||||
|
||||
# verify expected remote mte deats
|
||||
await tractor.pause()
|
||||
assert ctx._remote_error is mte
|
||||
assert mte.expected_msg_type is Return
|
||||
# verify expected remote mte deats
|
||||
try:
|
||||
assert ctx._local_error is None
|
||||
assert (
|
||||
mte is
|
||||
ctx._remote_error is
|
||||
ctx.maybe_error is
|
||||
ctx.outcome
|
||||
)
|
||||
except:
|
||||
# XXX should never get here..
|
||||
await tractor.pause(shield=True)
|
||||
raise
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if should_raise is None:
|
||||
assert maybe_mte is None
|
||||
|
||||
await p.cancel_actor()
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue