48 lines
1.8 KiB
Markdown
48 lines
1.8 KiB
Markdown
|
---
|
||
|
|
model: gpt-5.6-sol
|
||
|
|
service: opencode
|
||
|
|
session: tractor-addr-unpacking
|
||
|
|
timestamp: 2026-08-26T02:24:34Z
|
||
|
|
git_ref: 2245f094
|
||
|
|
scope: code
|
||
|
|
substantive: true
|
||
|
|
raw_file: 20260826T022434Z_2245f094_prompt_io.raw.md
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Prompt
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
After committing the owned WireGuard interface lifecycle, the human
|
||
|
|
asked to continue with the next established incremental step.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Response summary
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Added a WG-specific composition context which owns one declared
|
||
|
|
bindspace and an ordered interface stack. It snapshots caller-owned
|
||
|
|
layer order before checkpointing, enters interfaces outermost-first,
|
||
|
|
and guarantees inside-out interface teardown before bindspace release.
|
||
|
|
Its inbound type shows the `(WGTunnelSpec, WGInterfaceConfig)` pairing
|
||
|
|
directly, and its docstring depicts the stack and unwind order.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Files changed
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- `tractor/discovery/_tunnel.py` - bindspace/interface stack driver.
|
||
|
|
- `tractor/discovery/__init__.py` - public layer and driver exports.
|
||
|
|
- `tests/discovery/test_wg_iface_lifecycle.py` - mutable-input,
|
||
|
|
cancellation and nested teardown-order coverage.
|
||
|
|
- `ai/tpt-backends/03_wg_tunnel_bindspace.md` - implemented composition
|
||
|
|
and ownership-order contract.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Human edits
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The human accepted and committed the preceding reviewed lifecycle
|
||
|
|
boundary, then explicitly requested the next step. That selected the
|
||
|
|
previously established bindspace/WireGuard composition boundary. In
|
||
|
|
staged review, the human requested an explicit interface-stack analogy
|
||
|
|
and a small ASCII diagram explaining entry and exit order. The human
|
||
|
|
then identified `WGInterfaceLayer` as an unnecessary single-use alias
|
||
|
|
which obscured the inbound tuple shape. The agent applied both
|
||
|
|
human-directed edits. The human accepted the fake lifecycle test as a
|
||
|
|
focused control-flow check which avoids pyroute2 overhead, while noting
|
||
|
|
their general preference for end-to-end coverage. No direct manual
|
||
|
|
source edits were observed.
|